Jim Kingsdale

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

Number of Stocks: 53 long
Concentration: Top 5 holdings = 32% of total
Percent Long: 82.7%
Percent Short: 0%
Top 5 Holdings,
in order:
Sociedad de Chile (SQM)
Canadian Oil Sands Trust - COSWF (oil sands)
Diamond Offshore (DO)
Petrobank (PBEGF)
Transocean Inc. - RIG (drilling and services)

Note: percentages above taken on stock portion of portfolio only

PERFORMANCE

 

EIS

OIH

IYE

SPY (without DIVS

2008 YTD

-5.4%

-2.7%

-5.5%

-11.9%

August 2008

-9.6%

-4.6%

-0.3%

1.5%

July 2008

-21.8%

-13.0%

-14.35%

-0.1%

June 2008

4.4%

5.0%

2.3%

-8.8%

May 2008

16.6%

7.6%

3.7%

1.5%

April 2008

11.3%

11.0%

10.9%

7.2%

March 2008

-6.9%

0.2%

-2.3%

-2.0%

February 2008

10.4%

12%

8.5%

-2.6%

January 2008

-4.4%

-16.7%

-11.2%

-6.04%

2007

38.7%

35.3%

39.7%

3.1%

2006

28.9%

8.55%

1.05%

13.62%

2005

34.4%

51.4%

52.43%

3.0%

2004

38.2%

37.21%

26.74%

8.99%

EIS = Energy Investment Strategies account
OIH = Oil services ETF
IYE = Broad oil and gas ETF
SPY = S&P 500 without dividends reinvested

Click here to see complete historical information regarding performance.

LOOKING FORWARD

SUMMARY

Stocks are in a bear market as the U.S. economy seems headed for recession in the short term.  I believe it will not be a short recession for a number of reasons:

  1. In the modern era of less manufacturing and lower inventory levels the economic cycles have gotten longer, so this down cycle could also be a long one.
  2. Real interest rates are already very low and inflation is a substantial risk.  Therefore the Fed has little ability to lower interest rates to take the economy out of recession. 
  3. The U.S. economy is being “taxed” very substantially by its oil and other trade deficit which has a greater depressant effect on the economy than does the stimulative effect of the Federal budget deficit.  Thus we are unlikely to get a Keynesian sort of stimulus effect.
  4. I expect the growth rate of China and other developing Asian economies to slow due to  electricity shortages, recently higher oil prices, and new inflation fears.  These economies will still grow, but their slower rate of growth bodes ill for the U.S. economy.
  5. Housing prices are still declining.  A slowing of the decline of home prices  may happen, but that is still not a stimulus to the economy.  If the housing price decline  bottoms, that would help the economy, but I doubt we will see that for a while.

If the economy continues to decline for the next 6 - 18 months, which will cause further earnings declines, stocks should also be hurt further.  That said, the stock market generally anticipates the economy and is likely to turn up about six months before the economy does starting when the economy is at its weakest point.  I can’t predict when the current bear market in stocks will reverse but I am sure that there will be short, energetic counter-trend rallies which some will misinterpret as the end of the bear market.

In the longer term - two to three years - I expect to see much higher oil prices starting by mid 2010 at the latest and caused by declining production.  I think much higher oil prices will deal the U.S. economy another strong blow. Since the economy will already be in a weakened posture, possibly still in the current recession, it is likely to become much weaker much more quickly when it is hit with higher oil prices.  I suspect that will have very negative implications for stocks. 

In sum, the odds favor lower and possibly very much lower stock prices going forward.  Therefore I want to keep a substantial portion of my investments in cash and options on longer dated oil futures.  An alternative to the futures options would be to invest in an oil ETF such as stock symbol OIL.

If home prices show signs of improving or if the price of oil were to drop well below $100 I would want to reconsider the above strategy.

CRUDE OIL

Crude oil is testing lower levels.  Ordinarily I would expect it to hold above $100 through the winter bolstered by higher winter demand and potential efforts by OPEC to defend the $100 price level.  However this is an election year.  Some cynics suggest that the Saudis may want to avoid high oil prices during the U.S. election to foster the election of a Republican.  That may be true and I would not be surprised to see oil continue to be weak through the election.

In theory oil service and drilling stocks should not be much affected by lower oil prices since the global demand for finding and retrieving oil from ever more difficult and expensive new fields should be strong so long as oil stays above, say, $80.  But the fact is that as oil has pulled back from $147 to about $110, the OIH fund of oil service and drilling stocks has done only slightly better than the IYE index that combines oil exploration and production companies with oil service and drilling companies.  The theory has not worked in stock market reality. 

NATURAL GAS

Gas has been weaker than oil because gas inventories are adequate and because gas production has been increasing significantly due to new unconventional plays of major size that can now be developed using new horizontal drilling and new fracking technologies.  Demand for gas is likely to grow based on its lower cost.  New transportation uses in North America look to be coming on stream along with new electrical generating demand and potentially new industrial demand as natural gas intensive plants move back to North American from which they had migrated a few years ago when the price spiking above $15 for a short time.  It is hard to predict the timing of a recovery in natural gas prices, but patient investors in natural gas names will eventually be vindicated, I think.  Though perhaps not in my lifetime (just kidding, I hope).  

This article has 16 comments:

  •  
    Sep 07 07:48 PM
    Good review, I suspect you are correct, there is nothing to stimulate a recovery in stocks, and much to retard one. The Congress and the new president, whoever, will feel compelled to do something and it will likely involve more taxes and regulation interfering with the economy so that is a negative. Eventually oil will rise and the brutality of the damage it will do might, only might, simulate an energy initiative which might be the harbinger of a recovery of sorts. But housing stays a dead weight for years, even with the new super national lending agency we will be getting. No good and possibly the end of hope for a while.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 07 10:37 PM
    Now that we are all paying attention to bubbles, consider the federal budget deficit. Escalating out of control, check. Bigger than official estimates, check. No one paying attention or particularly concerned, check.

    What would happen if the US were suddenly forced to live within its means? Long recession is right.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 12:32 AM
    You are correct about the recession .. Nothing has changed.. And wit the FRE/FNM debacle, watch for other industires to start asking for bailouts as well.... In fact, the auto industry has asked for a loan of (variously) $25Bill -> $50Billion .... Kinda makes the war in Iraq seem cheap, doesn't it... Your tax-dollars at work!!!

    I reviewed your holdings... I'd seriously begin to sell them off in a bounce and buy stocks that are moving up during this period... Look at FRED for example.. Moving up steadily during our downturn..

    jegan ;-)
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 03:36 AM
    Jim has written a good article with the conclusion that we are in a bear market and the recession will be long instead of short and sharp. Agree with this assessment and unless one is really skillful or lucky, it may be appropriate to focus on return of capital rather than return on capital- in other words stay in cash with a small trading portfolio. John Egan recommendation to trade [moving only with momentum situations with stop loss] is not a bad idea.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 08:01 AM
    Well based on these charts, you should of sold the energy stuff in June, or after the first pullback in Jan....
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 08:46 AM
    it's already been a long recession (june 2007 to sept 2008).
    > jack
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 09:05 AM
    Cash isn't any good, either. We keep debasing the currency by shipping SO many dollars overseas.

    Only positive I see is you guys are ALL becoming BEARS. That's what will ultimately turn the market.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 10:17 AM
    paulk's cute contrarian sentiment argument is getting as old as Cramer's and CNBC's attempts at bottom-calling. Big picture-wise, this market hasn't turned anywhere but sideways for the past seven years.

    As far as the economy goes, go talk to any middle income family trying to deal with spiraling food, fuel, education, and health care costs and ask what's left in their pockets at the end of the week to spend. Then talk to lower income folks in New England and you'll find they're even more strapped and wondering how they'll keep their houses warm this winter.

    Life is not a technical rally, and we will not suddenly bounce out of this recession. The US market looks done to me for your average investor, and we're left with a handful of hedgies trying to jerk a day's pay out of every so-called rally, which is really just short-covering by these same short-term players.
    Reply
  •  
    The bailout of Fannie and Freddie will not stop the price of housing from falling further --- but it should enable qualified buyers to get mortgages. In areas like CA and FL, most of those mortgages will be on short sales and foreclosures where the "bottom" will occur when the price becomes affordable or it becomes cheaper to buy than rent.

    Despite the "good news" about yet another government bailout, the fundamentals remain the same. Even at 80 dollars a barrel gas is not cheap --- provided it gets to that level at all. Food is expensive. Education is expensive. Health care is expensive. Is it any wonder that the average consumer is tapped? With unemployment on the rise and a negative savings rate, a great many people are living hand to mouth. Something needs to change.

    The politicians in DC need to stop bickering and come up with a domestic energy policy. T. Boone Pickens has been advocating a plan and putting his money where his mouth is. Natural gas will be a major factor in weening America off foreign oil, along with coal, wind, solar, and nuclear. We need to build the infrastructure to support this policy, which in turn will help to create jobs and fund other issues, such as education and health care. It will not happen over night, but we have to start somewhere and soon.

    The government has bailed out Bear, Freddie, and Fannie and may not be done. My question is, who is going to bail out the government? The taxpayer? Most likely not. The alternative? Better learn to speak Arabic, Chinese, or Russian.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 11:31 AM
    "... Kinda makes the war in Iraq seem cheap, doesn't it ..."

    Nope. Not even a little bit. Even the grand gesture to bail out the Chinese, Japanese, and PIMCO is small compared to the amount we are burning in Iraq in order to ... ?

    Oh yes, keep the terrorists over there.

    But what about the terrorists in Washington?
    Reply
  •  
    Our lack of discipline(spending above our means with low savings rate), and our rewards for extreme risk takers (huge salaries/bonuses/stock options/ government bailouts) leaves us fragile. In addition to an aggressive, multifaceted, full-court press energy policy, we need to acknowlegde the need to cut government entitlements. That means deep rationing of medical services (I speak with some inside knowledge here as a physician), and meaningful cuts to social security. Will Obama have the fortitude to veto spending, or even the intention?
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 11:48 AM
    Jim:
    There was an article out last week that stated that energy stock valuations have not been this low since 1982. Now I know all about the case for lower oil prices but oil is still above $100 and we are trading at a 25 year low? That just does not make any sense at all. Especially since we have added millions more auto drivers worlwide since 1982. Traders are pricing energy stocks for a global depression. As bad as things are, I just don't see it as getting that bad. Maybe I'm just an optimist.

    Yank
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 12:52 PM
    Jim, suggest you read an article by Irwin Greenstein, Sept. 8, Seeking Alpha/China Stocks.

    I believe the sell off is almost over in the CSI 300, expect the 2000 area to hold and move sharply higher in the ensuing 12 months.

    The length of our Recession will be motivated by external rather than internal factors.

    Contrary to the short covering rally in progress, LIBOR took an upward spike on the Frannie news.

    Meanwhile, reversals have already occurred in both Washington Mutual and Lehman.

    The Treasury will issue $500 Billion trying to forestall a meltdown, all told. This is not the way to solve the problem. The Fed has to get onboard before DEFLATION takes hold.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 05:12 PM
    There are additional reasons for a pro longed recession. 1) Households are facing more severe liquidity constraints than in the past. Credit will continue to tightened, and consumer spending should gradually contract. 2) No new federal stimulus is coming. 3) In 2010, tax rates go back to the Clinton year levels.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 07:40 PM
    and by the way, the sky is falling!
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 09 12:42 AM
    New SuperCollider about to be fully tested. About 7 times more powerful than any existing(Fermi). Expected to attempt recreation of Big Bang. Some fear creation of mini Black Holes. The Sky may indeed fall.

    Meanwhile, Idaho has confirmed a case of Bird Flu in a couple of Game Birds. Increases in the number of cases worldwide is escalating but the Media apparently has decided that this is old news undeserving of attention.
    Reply
More by Jim Kingsdale

Articles on related themes