Bill Cara

About this author: By this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

[The following is excerpted from Bill Cara's Week-in-Review from September 7, 2008]

Technical analysts looking at the major equity market indexes of various countries this weekend must be stunned to see a consistent pattern where prices are on the verge of simultaneous collapse.

I hope my opening paragraph captured your attention because it also means the end of the Bear is one step removed. Just one more leg down – probably 10-12% -- is what the sellers will take to complete the bottom, I believe.

That’s good news, but it’s not to say that the next Bull market is going to soar from the beginning. In fact; unless and until Humungous Bank & Broker writes off all or most of the dead assets, and replaces lost reserves or restructures/amalgamates with other financial services companies, I think the next Bull for equities will be a rather quiet affair, hamstrung by ongoing credit market problems.

A week ago I wrote in this space,

The fact is that the growth rate of the global economy is rapidly slowing, with large pockets of recession, and the rate of producer and consumer inflation is far higher than the comfort level of any respectable central banker. The major financial services companies (banks, broker-dealers, insurance companies) are still to write down their so-called asset backed commercial paper holdings to market values, which is the reason these companies are illiquid and have limited funds to lend to producers and consumers. This credit crunch leads to a quandary for capital managers, producers and consumers alike. Where capital has been flowing has nothing to do with Bull markets or bullishness and everything to do with a desperate attempt to find safe havens… Some capital managers are in denial; others are cranking out their excuses because they fear that the Other People whose Money they have been managing improperly are about to become an ugly crowd of litigants.

After the close a week ago Thursday, which was up +213 points in the DJIA index and +329 points over three straight days of gains, I noted early the next day: “Traders have not started a Bull market; they are not even bullish. They are scared.” I stated that my 10000/2000 opinion was still in place, reminding you, “it’s not a forecast; it’s a guess” and one that I made Feb-10-2007, and again in March, then June, and December of last year and again earlier this year.

That Friday the DJIA sold down -172 points, most of it in the late afternoon. This week the DJIA index dropped a further -323 points. That’s a loss of -500 points in five sessions (Monday was Labor Day).

At about 11:20am ET on Friday, the DJIA stood at 11038. Just because the index was pushed up +200 points in the last 4½ hours, which happened after European and Asia-Pacific markets were closed, I continue to opine: Where’s the Bull? Traders are scared.

To repeat, every major international equity index is on the verge of a breakdown. Look at Canada’s TSX Composite, the UK FTSE 100, France’s CAC, the German DAX, the Italian MIBTEL, the Spanish IGBM, the Japanese Nikkei 225, the Shanghai Composite; the Hong Kong Hang Seng, the Australian All Ordinaries, and Brazilian Bovespa. They are all testing primary support levels, apparently ready for one more leg down, but also within 5% to 15% of their ultimate bottom.

The closer an index gets to its cycle bottom; there will be some sectors and industries that bear watching. It could be that in some of these cases, the July 15 lows will prove to be their long-term cycle lows. Talking Heads (on behalf of Wall Street) coming to you via Mainstream Media would have you believe that those July 15 lows are clearly the bottom for the Financials. I disagree with respect to the majority of the Financials, but I am saying that there are probably some other industries and groups that will not drop lower than July 15 lows.

This is a trader’s market. Volatility demands it. A week ago, I summed up my concerns for the Buy-and-Hold crowd with these words, “Doesn’t this situation go to show that the mutual fund model no longer works? There are times that traders cannot afford to be 100% long, even with large cash positions.”

This week, the DJIA and Russell small cap indexes dropped -2.8%, the S&P 500 fell -3.2% and the NASDAQ Composite plunged -4.7%. That was another tough week for those who are long only traders and very long-term position holders. As markets zero in on a cycle bottom, however, and there are low-risk values starting to pop up, traders have to remain poised for the final dump. That’s going to be the best point of entry.

Will the DJIA drop to 10000 and the NASDAQ Composite to 2000? I think so, but I have no crystal ball. When I first made that call, I thought it would happen in 2007, but the Financials were really goosed after that, which extended the Bull. So I made the call again in June, July, September, after I saw how the XLF/XLY had run into problems.

Bill Cara: Week #06 (2007-02-10) in Review [FINAL]
10 Feb 2007 ... In any case, I am looking for Dow 10000 (2007) before Dow 15000 (2009). ......

I repeated it again a few times this year because I was getting sick of listening to CNBC TV call a bottom halfway through the Bear. Anyway, the point is you need to take a big picture view so that you can set strategies. Then you watch the data series evolve, which plays into your setting up tactics.

You know, there is seldom a day go by when a Talking Head doesn’t make some mocking smart-ass remark like “I’m not smart enough to time the market.” What should be mandatory from regulators whenever some so-called professional makes that remark is to require the TV network to flash on the screen the person’s 1, 3 and 5 year performance record. Then we’ll all see the idiot is not smart enough to do anything.

This article has 4 comments:

  •  
    Sep 08 05:13 AM
    Nope, it's a market where a patient, value oriented long term investor can scoop up some nice bargains every few days. 90-95% of daytraders lose their money sooner or later. So don't tell me that daytrading is any receipe for success here. It's a receipe for desaster in any market environment. In the current environement, you either stay out and hold cash and high quality bonds, or you put money to work in value bargains or you simply hold on to your stuff (if you have good reason to do so) for the long term. But don't get sucked into daytrading frenzy - it will kill your health, your time, your finances and fill the pockets of the very few who succed at it.

    When someonesuggests you daytrade, there are but two possibilities for that: Either, he is a successful daytrader - then his advice is basically to get another loser into the game to take money from. Or else, he is a losing daytrader (one of the 90%+) and then you should steer clear of his advice anyway.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 09:14 PM
    Bill,
    You predicted in BusinessWeek the december issue of last December that DOW will be 13000 by december. How does that fit with you article here?Are you saying we are going to charge at 13000 before we hit 10000.The Dow chart and I am a beginner seem to get a bounce around that 11000 mark and there is a long consolidation pattern in that are running from December 2006 to early 2007 before the rally to 14000. It looks to me that the dow is ready for a long leg down but what are the chances we don't get a mini rally here that pushes above 12700?
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 09 04:12 PM
    I agree with last comment on daytrading-fill the pockets of the educational con artists that claim they can teach you trading-the most objective question is: if there is so much money to be made daytrading and they are experts why do they spend all their time trying to sell you there education and not trading themselves? Most of these guys don"t trade or are trying to supplement their addiction. Successful traders like Steidlmayer have made a career out of a few great long term trades. A couple of trades that worked out over an entire career.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 25 09:26 AM
    While I disagree with the comment of fxtrader07 whose statistic about daytraders is popular but misleading ( probably includes all people who call themselves day traders both those with education and those without) my main point is to support the suggestion that commentators on the market are required to list their own performance.

    Why don't you take this one step further Bill Cara? Start as an example with your own record. Perhaps you can get buy in from Seeking Alpha and have them impose this requirement on all their contributors ! that would really set Seeking Alpha apart from the Jim Cramer crowd!

    You could at this time still develop the format and the methodology to keep the numbers current and relevant. I think it is a great idea, but am afraid that it will allow some charlatans to rig the numbers.

    BLUK
    Reply
Articles on related themes